Food:

CLINICAL INFORMATION for Pineapple

Clinical History

Number of Studies:
1-5
Number of Patients:
21-50
Symptoms:

Intense itching and urticarial rashes, followed by abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea. 20 of 32 patients presented with shock after eating pineapples (Kabir et al. 1993)

Asthmatic reactions and gastrointestinal symptoms after ingestion of pineapple (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

Skin Prick Test

Number of Studies:
1-5
Food/Type of allergen:
Bromelain (a purified protease of pineapple) (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979) (Nettis et al. 2001)
Protocol:
(controls, definition of positive etc)
Histamine chloride (0.1%) and NaCl (0.9%) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (Nettis et al. 2001)
Number of Patients:

1 (Nettis et al. 2001)

6 workers sensitized to papain and 60 asthmatics workers not exposed to airborne proteases but probably to these as constituents of foods (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

Summary of Results:

SPT for bromelain was positive (Nettis et al. 2001)

5/6 workers sensitized to papain, and 2/60 showed positive skin tests to bromelain (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

IgE assay (by RAST, CAP etc)

Number of Studies:
1-5
Food/Type of allergen:

Bromelain (a purified protease of pineapple) (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979) .

Purified recombinant pineaple profilin and pineapple extract prepared as follows: Fresh fruits were cut into short pieces and ground in a mortar under liquid nitrogen to a fine powder. This powder was then added to prechilled 4-hyxdroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone (–20°C, 1:2 wt/vol) in several portions, and the obtained suspension was homogenized with a spinning blade homogenizer. Chilled acetone (–20°C) was added to a final fruit/solvent ratio of 1:5. After the suspension was stored overnight at –20°C, it was filtrated over a suction filter and washed twice with chilled acetone (–20°C) and once with chilled acetone-diethyl ether (1:1, –20°C). The filter residue was lyophilized. One gram of the obtained acetone powder was extracted for 40 minutes at 4°C with 20 mL of PBS (10 mmol/L potassium phosphate and 150 mmol/L NaCl pH7.4). The suspension was centrifuged for 30 minutes at 20,000g, and the supernatant was filtered through a 1.2-µm membrane (Reindl et al. 2002)

IgE protocol:
RAST (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

EAST, CAP (Reindl et al. 2002).

Number of Patients:

6 workers sensitized to papain and 60 asthmatics workers not exposed to airborne proteases but probably to these as constituents of foods (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

19 (Reindl et al. 2002).

Summary of Results:

5/6 workers sensitized to papain, and 8/60 had positive RAST results to bromelain (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

10/19 sera reacted with pineapple in the CAP assay and six had a positive result in the pineapple profilin EAST (Reindl et al. 2002).

Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting separation:
Protein extract was separated by means of SDS-PAGE (T = 12.5%, C = 2.7%) under reducing conditions (Reindl et al. 2002)
Immunoblotting detection method:
The separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes by means of semidry blotting. The membrane was blocked with 0.05 mol/L TRIS-HCl, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, and 0.3% Tween-20 (pH 7.4). Cut nitrocellulose strips were incubated overnight in diluted patient serum (1:6.7). Bound IgE was detected with mouse monoclonal anti-human IgE alkaline phosphatase conjugate (1:750) and subsequent staining with 4-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (Reindl et al. 2002)
Immunoblotting results:

IgE binding to the recombinant profilins was observed in 8/19 sera from subjects with suspected pineapple allergy (42%). In the pineapple extract immunoblot 13 sera reacted with proteins ranging from 20 to 50 kda. At least 2 sera reacted only to pineapple profilin (Reindl et al. 2002).

Oral provocation

Number of Studies:
Food used and oral provocation vehicle
Fresh Pineapple
Blind?
No
Number of Patients?

A 58-year-old worker (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

32 patients (Kabir et al. 1993)

Dose response

Not described

Symptoms

Asthmatic reactions and gastrointestinal symptoms after ingestion of 190 g pineapple (Baur and Fruhmann, 1979)

Most of the patients complained of intense itching and urticarial rashes, followed by abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea. 18 patients had an urticarial rash and a flushed face. Although none of the patients were severely dehydrated, 20 patients presented with shock. Their peripheral pulse and blood pressure were low or absent suggesting an anaphylactic reaction (Kabir et al. 1993)

IgE cross-reactivity and Polysensitisation

High IgE cross-reactivity between pineapple profilin, birch pollen profilin Bet v 2 and latex profilin Hev b 8 was demonstrated by immunoblot inhibition as well as EAST inhibition experiments. In addition, cross-reactivitiy between pineapple profilin and banana profilin has been demonstrated (Reindl et al. 2002).

Other Clinical information


Reviews (0)

References (4)

Baur X, Fruhmann G
Allergic reactions, including asthma, to the pineapple protease bromelain following occupational exposure Clin Allergy. 9(5):443-50 1979
PUBMED ID: 498486
[896]
Kabir I, Speelman P, Islam A
Systemic allergic reaction and diarrhoea after pineapple ingestion Trop Geogr Med. 45(2):77-9 1993
PUBMED ID: 8511816
[894]
Nettis E, Napoli G, Ferrannini A, Tursi A
IgE-mediated allergy to bromelain Allergy. Mar;56(3):257-8 2001
PUBMED ID: 11251415
[1044]
Reindl J, Rihs HP, Scheurer S, Wangorsch A, Haustein D, Vieths S
IgE reactivity to profilin in pollen-sensitized subjects with adverse reactions to banana and pineapple. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 128(2):105-14. 2002
PUBMED ID: 12065910
[601]
This record was last modified on 18-Oct-2006
Page processed in 0.047 seconds