RAST assays were positive in 2/3 patients (3.21 and 0.75 PRU/ml) (Gaig et al. 1999) [58].
RAST was positive (0.8 PRU/ml) (Gaig et al. 1992) [336]
EIA was positive but RAST and histamine release assays were negative (Igea et al. 1991) [825]
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting separation:
Protein separation was performed using 12.5% acrylamide 1D SDS-PAGE gels. Samples were reduced with beta-mercaptoethanol (Gaig et al. 1999) [58].
Immunoblotting detection method:
Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes in buffer. Membranes were blocked , incubated with sera (undiluted) and bound IgE detected by peroxidase conjugated rabbit antihuman IgE. Blots were developed by chemiluminescence (Gaig et al. 1999) [58].
Immunoblotting results:
Each of the 3 patients reacted only with a 29 kDa protein (Gaig et al. 1999) [58].
Oral provocation
Number of Studies:
1-5
Food used and oral provocation
vehicle
Pomegranate seeds were crushed and mixed with 100 cl of strawberry yoghourt (Igea et al. 1991) [825]
A single dose was given daily and the dose was increased 2-fold in the subsequent days. The challenge was positive with 40 g of pomegranate (Igea et al. 1991) [825]
Symptoms
Tongue angioedema developed 4 h after (Igea et al. 1991) [825]
Garcia J, Carreno A, Contreras L et al
Alergia a la granda. Revision de nuestra casuistica Rev Esp Alergol Immunol Clin 11:Suppl 2 146. 1996
PUBMED ID:
unknown
[338]
Igea JM, Cuesta J, Cuevas M, Elias LM, Marcos C, Lazaro M, Compaired JA
Adverse reaction to pomegranate ingestion Allergy. 46(6):472-4. 1991
PUBMED ID:
1957996